islamic terror makes the case for its own slaughter

By now, most have probably heard at least something about the terrorist attacks on civilian targets in Ahmedabad and Bangalore. Indian bloggers pretty much have the tragedy covered, but I’ve a few thoughts on the matter:

First, where are those Islamic groups trying to convince us that theirs is a religion of peace? While CAIR is extracting sand from its birth canal over laptop searches, people are busy killing unarmed civilians—at hospitals, no less—in their name. If you want to convince me that you’re not simply the Imam of the Holy Shrine of Douchestan, mayyyybe you’d like to speak up and convince your followers to stop being homicidal maniacs.

Second, one will note that India is not occupying any Muslim lands (quite the opposite, in fact), let alone holy ones. India was not terribly supportive of the establishment of Israel until after three wars with her neighbor (and Islamic homeland). India did not supply arms to the Mujahedeen. India’s crime is not being a willing addition to the global Islamic caliphate, and this is reason enough to be attacked.

So children, why do we go fight terrorists overseas? So they don’t have time to kill our civilians at home. Because this is what happens when we treat terror as a civilian police case:

n.b.—the gentleman at about :45 is Opposition Leader Lal Krishna Advani.

Comments